I had one of those off days yesterday and wasted a bit of time there and on news blogs. My being out of focus was quite apparent in my grammar and spelling here, in fact.

Now I just have to get past your “sold in a week” comment in the post above. Wow. Seriously cool.

For example, one of the questions Matt Damon has is “Does she really think the dinosaurs were here 4,000 years ago?” That’s because of a so-called Palin quote that’s floating around the Internet now, which has been proven to be false, but that’s not being widely circulated. So a lot of people are wondering what her view on this actually is — unlike the McCain-Palin camp slamming the Enquirerer for its accusations of Palin’s infidelity (which, as far as I know, are still unproven), the M-P folks haven’t officially responded to the whole dinosaur question. So there you go.

I certainly don’t feel you’re attacking her–sorry if I made it sound that way. I’m not a fan of the woman’s in any shape or form and want the word out on her policies.

I live in the heart of the bible belt in Oklahoma and people around here think she’s being picked on because she’s a woman–which is so ridiculous considering what I’ve heard them say about Hillary. But was in a restaurant and actually heard some women disussing voting for her just to show the liberal media a thing or two, right after saying they didn’t think she was the best choice.

So, I was more or less wondering aloud about how many of the obvious false Internet rumors are coming from conservative corners…

Even when there are attacks (and I can’t help but think of one of the recent GOP ads supporting Palin, the one with the wolves), I don’t think that’s a reason for people to be quiet. We’re fortunate enough to have freedom of speech. If people decide to share their opinions on the candidates — whatever their opinions, for whichever candidate — rock on.