<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harlequin Horizons &#8211; A Bookseller&#8217;s Perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackiekessler.com/blog/2009/11/24/harlequin-horizons-a-booksellers-perspective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackiekessler.com/blog/2009/11/24/harlequin-horizons-a-booksellers-perspective/</link>
	<description>Jackie Kessler's blog, and the demon Jezebel's talk-radio show</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 10:21:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.jackiekessler.com/blog/2009/11/24/harlequin-horizons-a-booksellers-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-26085</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackiekessler.com/blog/2009/11/24/harlequin-horizons-a-booksellers-perspective/#comment-26085</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve given thought to why so many self-published/vanity authors rabidly support the industry that took advantage of them. Seeing their name on a book cover validates their self-esteem, even if they had to pay to see it there. As one guy said, &quot;Yeah, I had to pay for it, nobody bought my books, but it&#039;s still a rush.&quot; It&#039;s the T-ball analogy used elsewhere:
http://criminalbrief.com/?p=6990

Vanity authors must defend their publisher like people defend their tobacco company or yuppie cocaine dealerâ€“ if they are wrong then you must be wrong, too, and that can&#039;t be allowed to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve given thought to why so many self-published/vanity authors rabidly support the industry that took advantage of them. Seeing their name on a book cover validates their self-esteem, even if they had to pay to see it there. As one guy said, &#8220;Yeah, I had to pay for it, nobody bought my books, but it&#8217;s still a rush.&#8221; It&#8217;s the T-ball analogy used elsewhere:<br />
<a href="http://criminalbrief.com/?p=6990" rel="nofollow">http://criminalbrief.com/?p=6990</a></p>
<p>Vanity authors must defend their publisher like people defend their tobacco company or yuppie cocaine dealerâ€“ if they are wrong then you must be wrong, too, and that can&#8217;t be allowed to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah M. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.jackiekessler.com/blog/2009/11/24/harlequin-horizons-a-booksellers-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-25909</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah M. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackiekessler.com/blog/2009/11/24/harlequin-horizons-a-booksellers-perspective/#comment-25909</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to hear another perspective on this, and interesting that someone outside of the authors also seems to think it&#039;s a rip-off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to hear another perspective on this, and interesting that someone outside of the authors also seems to think it&#8217;s a rip-off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

